Three measures of the same fund peak in three different months, and the distance between them is long enough for a distribution team to be praised, promoted and replaced.
Because they measure different things and peak years apart. In a seven-year cohort forecast of an evergreen private credit fund, the organic growth rate peaks at 48.1 per cent in month 29, net flows peak at 10.51 million in month 44, and gross flows are still rising at month 84. The head of distribution reporting gross flows sees a business that grew every month for seven years. The chief executive reporting the organic growth rate sees one that stopped improving in month 29.
Worked in full in The Private Wealth Fundraiser by Julian R. Sterling, with every figure reproduced in a free workbook.See the book on Amazon →
The model is a cohort forecast of an evergreen private credit fund. Seed and anchor capital of 150 million. Four distribution platforms, 4,000 in-scope advisors between them, going live in months 7, 12, 17 and 18. Conversion to producing status saturates at a ceiling of 18 per cent of in-scope advisors, half of it reached by nine months of platform tenure. Tickets per producing advisor start at 0.10 a month and rise toward 0.22. Average ticket starts at 70,000. Redemptions run at 1.0 per cent a month, applied only to money that has been in the fund longer than twelve months.
Run it for seven years and the three headline measures peak in three different months.
| Measure | Peak month | Value at peak |
|---|---|---|
| Organic growth rate | 29 | 48.1 per cent |
| Net flows | 44 | 10.51 million |
| Gross flows | 84 | 14.23 million |
Fifteen months separate the net flow peak from the growth rate peak. From the growth rate peak to the end of the horizon is four and a half years, and gross flows are still climbing throughout. Both readings are correct. They are measuring different things.
The same fund, reported at four milestone months, in millions.
| Month | Gross | Redemptions | Net | Assets | Growth rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 3.65 | 1.41 | 2.24 | 156 | 17.5 |
| 36 | 11.81 | 1.67 | 10.13 | 288 | 43.7 |
| 60 | 13.70 | 3.78 | 9.92 | 536 | 22.6 |
| 84 | 14.23 | 5.91 | 8.33 | 755 | 13.4 |
Gross flows rise in every single month of the seven years. The organic growth rate crosses below 40 per cent at month 40, below 30 at month 50, and below 20 at month 66. It finishes at 13.4 per cent. A board shown the month 36 row can see the month 84 row coming, provided it is shown gross, redemptions and net together rather than one of them alone.
The often-quoted warning — that a mature evergreen vehicle can double its gross inflows and still be in decline — is true here and almost invisible. Gross flows go from 6.20 million in month 22 to 12.88 million in month 45, a factor of 2.08, while the organic growth rate slips from 34.8 to 33.9 per cent. Eight tenths of a point across twenty-three months is not a warning anyone acts on. The version the model actually produces is far starker: from month 29 to month 84 gross flows rise by a factor of 1.44 while the growth rate falls from 48.1 per cent to 13.4 per cent. Not a doubling against a slight decline. A flattening against a collapse.
Redemptions as a share of gross flows do not climb steadily with the age of the book. They start high, improve for three years, and then deteriorate for as long as the fund exists.
| Month | Redemptions as share of gross, per cent |
|---|---|
| 18 | 38.7 |
| 24 | 18.1 |
| 36 | 14.2 |
| 48 | 20.2 |
| 60 | 27.6 |
| 72 | 34.8 |
| 84 | 41.5 |
Year three is the bottom of the U. It is also, precisely, the moment a distribution team first has enough history to build a credible multi-year forecast — and the two years of history it can see show redemption drag falling. A team that extrapolates the trend in front of it will forecast drag continuing to improve at the exact moment it is about to reverse. The fix is structural, not a matter of judgment: model redemptions as a rate on aged tranches and the U-shape appears by itself. Model them as a percentage of assets, or of gross flows, and the reversal stays invisible until it arrives.
Suppose the board sets a 30 per cent organic growth rate as the standard, and month 60 arrives with the fund at 22.6 per cent. Holding 30 per cent requires net flows of 13.15 million a month against the 9.92 million the model produces. Add back the 3.78 million of redemptions and it requires gross flows of 16.93 million against 13.70 — 24 per cent more.
Twenty-four per cent does not sound like much. It took four years to get gross flows from zero to 13.70 million, and the curve is flat by month 60 because every live platform has saturated. The extra cannot come from working the existing platforms harder. It has to come from new platforms, which take nine to twelve months from approval to meaningful production, which means the decision to add them had to be taken around month 48 — twelve months before anyone was looking at the 22.6 per cent.
The cohort model does not merely forecast. It dates the decision. The month a growth target becomes unreachable is not the month it is missed; it is the month the platform that would have made it reachable was not put into diligence.
One further figure is worth holding alongside the gloom. Cumulative gross flow over the seven years is 824 million against 755 million of closing assets: 83 per cent of everything ever raised is still there. That is a good outcome, and it is entirely compatible with a growth rate of 13 per cent.
In this cohort model it peaks at 48.1 per cent in month 29, then falls for the rest of the horizon. It crosses below 40 per cent at month 40, below 30 at month 50, and below 20 at month 66. It finishes at 13.4 per cent in month 84 while gross flows are still rising.
Measure both flow and assets against plan. At month 36 the base case is 11.81 million of gross flow and 288 million of assets. A conversion ceiling two points lower cuts flow 11.1 per cent and assets 6.6 per cent. A ticket 10 per cent smaller cuts flow 10.0 and assets 6.0. Platforms three months late cut flow only 5.5 per cent but assets 11.6.
Zero for the first twelve months of any tranche's life, then 1.0 per cent a month on that tranche, a 12 per cent annual rate applied only to aged money. Modelled that way, drag runs 38.7 per cent of gross flows at month 18, falls to 14.2 per cent at month 36, and rises to 41.5 per cent at month 84.
This article is one calculation from The Private Wealth Fundraiser. The book takes the same case from first principles to the decision, chapter by chapter, and every figure it prints is a live formula in the free companion workbooks.
Get the book on Amazon →Free companion files
Also on Amazon UK · Amazon Germany · Amazon France · Amazon Canada
Reading guide: private equity and private markets → · All 1706 articles →
If this book helped — or didn’t — a few lines on Amazon are worth more than they look: they are what the next reader goes on. Write a review. The workbook stays free either way.